When deploying applications at scale, you need to plan all your architecture components with current and future strategies in mind. Container orchestration tools help achieve this by automating the management of application microservices across all clusters.
There are few major containers orchestration tools listed below:
- Docker Swarm
- Kubernetes
- OpenShift
- Hashicorp Nomad
- Mesos
Today we'll talk about Docker Swarm and Kubernetes and we'll compare them in terms of features.
What is container orchestration
Container orchestration is a set of practices for managing the Docker Containers at large scale. As soon as containerized applications scale to large number of containers, then there is need of container management capabilities. Such as provisioning containers, scaling up and scaling down, manage networking, load balancing ,security and others.
Let's talk Kubernetes
Kubernetes is an open source, cloud native infrastructure tool that automates scaling, deployment and management of containerized applications.
Kubernetes was originally developed by google and later was handed over to Cloud Native Computing Foundation(CNCF) for enhancement and maintenance. Kubernetes is the most popular and highly in demand orchestrator tool. Kubernetes is complex tool and a bit difficult to learn compare to swarm.
Here are few main architecture components of Kubernetes below:
Cluster
A collection of multiple nodes, typically at least one master node and several worker nodes(also known as minions)
Node
A physical or Virtual Machine(VM)
Control Plane
A component that schedule and deploys application instances across all nodes
Kubelete
An agent process running on nodes. It is responsible of managing the state of each nodes and it can perform several actions to maintain a desired state.
Pods
Pods are basic scheduling unit. Pods consist of one or more containers co-located on a host machine and share same resources.
Deployments, Replicas and ReplicaSets
Docker Swarm
Docker swarm is native to Docker platform Docker was developed to maintain the application efficiency and availability in different runtime environments by deploying containerized application microservices across multiple clusters.
A mix of docker-compose, swarm, overlay network can be used to manage cluster of docker containers.
Docker swarm is still maturing in terms of functionalities when compare to other open source container orchestration tools.
Here are few main architecture components of Docker swarm below:
Swarm
A collection of nodes that include at-least one manager and several worker nodes.
Service
A task that agent nodes or managers are required to perform on the swarm.
Manager node
A node tasked with delivering work. It manages and distributes the task among worker nodes.
Worker node
A node responsible for running tasks distributed by the swarm's manager node.
Tasks
Set of commands
Choosing the right Orchestrator for your containers
Kubernetes focuses on open-source and modular orchestration, offering an efficient container orchestration solution for high demand applications with complex configuration.
Docker swarm emphasises ease of use, making it most suitable for simple applications that are quick to deploy and easy to manage.
Some fundamental differences between both
GUI:
Kubernetes features an easy web user interface(dashboards) that helps you
- Deploy containerized application on cluster
- Manage cluster resources
- View an error log, deployments, jobs
Unlike Kubernetes, Docker swarm does not come with Web UI to deploy applications and orchestrate containers. But there are some third party tools which can achieve this with Docker.
Availability:
Kubernetes ensure high availability by creating clusters to eliminate ingle point of failures. You can use Stacked Control Plane nodes that ensure availability by co-locating etcd objects with all available nodes of a cluster during failover. Or you can use external etcd objects for load balancing while controlling the control plane nodes separately.
For Docker to maintain high-availability, Docker uses service replication at swarm nodes level. A swarm manager deploys multiple instances of the same container with replicas of services in each.
Scalability:
Kubernetes supports autoscaling on both cluster level and pod level. Whereas Docker Swarm deploys containers quickly. This gives the orchestration tool faster reaction times that allow for on-demand scaling.
Monitoring:
Kubernetes offers multiple native logging and monitoring solutions for deployed services within a cluster. Also Kubernetes supports third-party integration to help with event-based monitoring.
On the other side Docker Swarm doesn't offer monitoring solution like Kubernetes. As a result you need to rely on third party applications to support monitoring. So monitoring a Docker Swarm is considered to e more complex than Kubernetes.
Note: If you think this helped you and you want to learn more stuff on devops, then I would recommend joining the Kodecloud devops course and go for the complete certification path by clicking this link